Drops in seismicity at two volcanoes in Alaska after the Denali earthquake.

John J. Sánchez (1) and Stephen R. McNutt (1)
(1) Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, Ann. Meet., Seattle, 12-16 Feb. 2004, student poster 120, p. A134-A135 (Abstracts CD)


On November 3, 2002 a Mw 7.9 earthquake ruptured segments of the Susitna Glacier, Denali, and Totschunda Faults in Alaska providing a unique opportunity to look for responses of active volcanic centers to shaking from a large regional earthquake. The Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO) monitors 24 volcanoes with seismograph networks. We examined one station for each volcano, typically within 5 km from the vent, unless noise, or other factors rendered the data unusable. Data were digitally filtered between 0.8 and 5 Hz to enhance local earthquakes. At Mt. Wrangell and Mt. Veniaminof the seismicity is dominated by earthquakes of the low-frequency type. Data for the period six weeks before to six weeks after the Mw 7.9 earthquake were then plotted at a standard scale used for AVO routine monitoring. Wrangell volcano, located less than a rupture length from the epicenter, had a background rate of 15 events per day. Data from station WANC could not be measured for 3 days after the Mw 7.9 earthquake because the large number and size of aftershocks precluded identification of local seismicity. For the following 40 days, however, its seismicity rate dropped by a factor of two. It is known that Wrangell increased its heat output after the Mw 9.2 Alaska earthquake of 1964 and again after the Mw 7.5 St.Elias earthquake of 1979. Mt. Veniaminof is located more than four rupture lengths from the epicenter; it has had recent mild eruptions, and a rate of about 10 seismic events per day on station VNNF. The volcano suffered a drop in seismicity by a factor of two after the earthquake; this may have lasted for 15 days. The detection thresholds of the seismograph networks at Mt. Wrangell and Mt. Veniaminof are low and the stations operated normally during the time of observation, thus we infer that the drops in seismicity are a response of the volcanoes to the Mw 7.9 earthquake. Most of the other 22 volcanoes showed no changes in seismicity that can be attributable to the Mw 7.9 earthquake. We conclude that intermediate-term seismicity drops occurred at Mt. Wrangell and Mt. Veniaminof volcanoes. This is in strong contrast to the cases of short-term seismicity increases observed at other volcanic systems such as Katmai, Mount Rainier, Yellowstone, Mammoth Mountain , and The Geysers, Coso and Cerro Prieto (Mexico) geothermal fields. This suggests that fundamentally different mechanisms may be acting to modify seismicity at volcanoes.